On 02/27/2010 08:25 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2010-02-27 at 02:09 -0500, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Feb 2010, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>
>> On Sat, 2010-02-27 at 06:03 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>
>>
>>> 2) Recent dnssec-conf updates all did receive several -1, nevertheless
>>> these updates were pushed.
>>>
>> This is indeed a problem. Obviously, relying on the judgment of
>> maintainers isn't working.
>>
> The karma arrived before it as pushed? I don't think it did.
I don't
know, I voted -1 at a time it previous votes had accumulated to +2.
> The 1.21-8
> release fixed the 1.21-7 release of also checking the "very old" config
> file location.
>
Still installing this *-1.21-8 release immediately brought down my local
bind.
To me, this qualifies as "what ever you did, was insufficient".
Sorry, I was replying in haste. I should've made clear that I
was
talking more in general, and don't have any specific direct knowledge of
the dnssec case. I know of multiple cases where updates have been pushed
hastily, but I don't have any direct knowledge of the dnssec case
specifically and wouldn't want to cast any aspersions in anyone's
direction there.
Well, to voting is an inadequate means for judging a package's quality,
because bugs showing in individual cases are not co-related to "works
for many" - It's a fundamental flaw of the system.
Ralf