On Mon, 14 Mar 2005, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 10:41:46 -0500, Jeff Spaleta
<jspaleta(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Naively this makes me think that
> something significant changed inside the sqlite package when it was
> renamed to sqlite from sqlite3.
Was there ever a published sqlite3 package for version 3.1.2? The
problem could be associated with internal sqlite library change
between 3.1.2 and 3.0.8.
I intentionally packaged the sqlite3 carried into core
separately from sqlite-2, because as the upstream author of
the sqlite package notes, in his doco on on his website, the
two may happily co-exist, and carry differing sonames.
The 'latest and greatest mentality' folks felt they knew best,
and that 'there should be only one', that people should not
use sqlite-2 under its previous name, and broke things
without a transition plan. Welcome to RawHide ;)
-- Russ Herrold