Harald Hoyer (harald(a)redhat.com) said:
Bill Nottingham wrote:
> It's a bad spec, and the way that it's done I don't really see how
it's
> fixable.
>
> Bill
>
Work with the Linux Foundation on a new/revised sane LSB spec?
http://www.linux-foundation.org/snapshots/booksets/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-C...
I'm not certain the spec could be 'fixed' while remaining backwards
compatibility;
users would still expect $network, $local_fs, $named to do something they really
can't.
Also, considering that a number of these concerns were raised before the very first
version of the spec was approved...
Bill