On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 05:14:08PM +0100, Tim Waugh wrote:
On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 16:45 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> For new packages, it's surely better to have a new crap package than
> no package at all.
When a package claims to do something but is actually no good at it, it
can cause real frustration to those who just want to use the computer
and not develop for it.
I would much rather the software that goes into a Fedora release be of
release quality, starting from the time the package review is finished,
or not be in it at all.
Is it just me?
I think there should be enough trust in the packagers to make the
decision as to whether or not a "new" package is ready or not for
consumption.
Ray