2:42pm seth vidal said:
On Fri, 2007-01-12 at 13:59 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
> That sounds like a "Server" spin to me.
>
> One thing we want to be very clear is that this is NOT designed for mission
> critical or even production systems, especially with just a 13month life
> span, and rapid adoption of new releases rather than backports. While it has
> the name "server" it means that this is useful if you're setting up a
server,
> not that we're going to offer any kind of support, do anything different for
> the updates, etc...
+1
-sv
Sure, but a rapid devel cycle is no excuse for a crappy OS. :-/
Consider that if the Fedora 7 Server has the admittedly idealistic goal of
being mission critical--for just 13 months--it would be much better
quality for *any* use.
../C