Steve, as you said in that thread, actually those assertions have
helped uncover a bug (tagged as "critical")! I don't see any way in
which they could "add additional crashes" if upstream does their
homework. So I don't think it's a good idea to remove them.
Iñaki
On Fri, 2 Aug 2019 at 17:47, Steven A. Falco <stevenfalco(a)gmail.com> wrote:
The upstream KiCAD project has requested that I remove GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS from the Fedora
package, as described here:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bug/1838448
What is the best way to do that? I can add "%undefine _hardened_build" (which
I am testing now) but I think that will remove other hardening features that I might want
to leave enabled.
Steve
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
--
Iñaki Úcar