Le Mer 26 novembre 2008 13:18, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski a écrit :
On Wednesday, 26 November 2008 at 12:56, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> You can do a lot of things, but my point is
> 1. most people won't bother and therefore
> 2. magic packages where the rpm -> srpm relation is not obvious are
> just introducing drag and problems in the Fedora workflows.
That should not be an argument to force packagers to use convoluted
rpm names.
Maybe it should be otherwise, but the current situation is the one I
described, and out packaging must work with current tools, not
hypothetical better tools which may appear next month or in ten years.
--
Nicolas Mailhot