On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 07:19:10AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015, at 05:23 AM, Petr Stodulka wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I have this request on bugzilla [0] for perl-less build of git due to
> large dependency on Perl modules, which is unwanted for atomic.
>
> I am not sure that's good idea.
> With this change we will create places for error messages about missing
> perl modules and that's something what we don't want.
I think we could design things so that existing users got git-perl on upgrades.
> E.g. missing git-add--interactive will bring one unusable option which
> will cause error message like this. I have two other bugs where I solve
> similar troubles. Separate whole git-add doesn't make sense. So if this
> is good trade off approved by others, OK, we can do that, with notice
> that some error messages can appear.
Right, I think were this package to exist, users would understand that
it doesn't have all of the git functionality.
What about adopting something similar to what has been done for the R package,
There is R-core, R-java R-devel and R. If you yum/dnf install R you get all of
them and you can install either one independently.
So in this case, we could have git-core, git-perl, git-foo and yum/dnf install git
would provides the full experience, while the atomic folks rely on git-core
instead.
Would this work?
Pierre