Hi Michael,
We have been told repeatedly that "the source is there" in CentOS
stream. I can see the scenario that RH branches from CentOS stream to
create a new minor release, and during QA, a bug is discovered and a
patch is backported (or created) to fix it internally in your minor
release branch. However, if that bug wants to be addressed also in the
next minor release, it will need to appear in the CentOS stream at some
point, whether via a patch or an entire source version bump.
If that's not the case, then RH is having some long living parallel git
repo which will eventually create ABI compatibility issues, and it is
also not what we have been told.
Am I missing something?
Thank you for your feedback.
Regards,
Carlos
On 7/2/23 07:35, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Fri, Jun 30 2023 at 11:09:41 AM -0700, Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez
<carlosrodrifernandez(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Going forward, you will see those patches contributions going into
> Centos stream first, and they will be accepted by RH engineers, and then
> they will end up in CentOS Stream distro first, and finally in RHEL.
Just for the record: no, you'll never see updates like those in CentOS
Stream because that was a stable branch update after RHEL had already
branched from CentOS Stream. Those patches will never appear in CentOS
Stream because I do not push them there.
Michael
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue