On 7/26/2007 4:07 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 16:32:30 -0500
Dan Yocum <yocum(a)fnal.gov> wrote:
> It's stable, widely tested, widely deployed, and
> it's being actively developed and maintained (which is more than can
> be said of some other filesystems that remain in the default list).
> It's in the kernel, it shouldn't be "hidden" in the depths of
> anaconda anymore.
>
How's the SELinux support these days? And why can't I boot from xfs
yet?
Back in the old Red Hat Linux and FC2-4 days when I had more time, I
seem to remember that Grub fully supported XFS. I could make all the
filesystems XFS and I could boot just fine from them. Nowadays, I have
less time, or I'm lazy, and just accept the Anaconda ext3 defaults for
the system partitions. I still store all the important user data under
XFS, though. I haven't lost a byte to XFS yet.
Can't comment on SELinux, don't use it :-) :-)
I agree with Dan.