On Thursday, 22 October 2009 at 00:07, Tom Lane wrote:
Lyos Gemini Norezel <lyos.gemininorezel(a)gmail.com> writes:
> Why not just require a secondary email address?
"Require" a secondary email address? Not everyone has one, or wants
to hand it over if they do. That sounds more like a recipe for driving
maintainers away than making sure you can contact them.
How about: Maintainers should provide a secondary e-mail address if their
primary address is supplied by their current employer.
Regards,
R.
--
Fedora
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion
http://rpmfusion.org | MPlayer
http://mplayerhq.hu
"Faith manages."
-- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"