On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 01:25:38AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 01:21:37PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> there's a nitpick bug in the spec file: since your package includes a
> lot of files from the kernel copied verbatim, the License: tag should
> include GPL as well.....
Very good point. I'll add that. Is there a Proper way to specify multiple
licenses in the license tag? "GPL and IPL", I guess? (As opposed to
"GPL/IPL" -- that'd be for dual-licensed, right? So annoying that IBM
didn't
chose to just GPL this.)
usually I do something like "parts GPL parts IPL" or so