On 21 February 2017 at 04:10, Vít Ondruch <vondruch(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Dne 21.2.2017 v 01:31 Ralf Corsepius napsal(a):
> On 02/21/2017 01:09 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 18:24:21 -0500
>> Neal Gompa <ngompa13(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 5:20 PM, Kevin Kofler
>>> <kevin.kofler(a)chello.at> wrote:
>>>> Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>>>>> I do not get what you mean by your statement, it is extremely vague
>>>>> with no detail. can you please expand on it in the context of the
>>>>> change? and the changes it will bring to the entire workflow of
>>>> Rawhide is just nowhere near working, half the packages have broken
>>>> dependencies due to not building with the latest GCC.
>> Thats a bit over dramatic don't you think?
> No. I fully agree with Kevin K.
> Feb 15 rawhide is 100% dysfunctional.
>> 968 currently on the FTBFS list, and even there many of those don't
>> have broken deps because the previous build still works.
> Many of the packages you are referring to probably are parts of dep
> chains, which gradually get fixed or have been missed during the
> official "mass-rebuild".
> What you are missing: Due to you keeping the package having been
> rebuilt since Feb 15 behind closed doors, NOBODY outside RH can have
> tested them and is able to go after run-time bugs these package
Come on. Outside or inside RH, we are on the same boat. There are
problems which needs to be resolved. I don't understand why you paint it
as some conspiracy.
It is Ralf's standard methodology for the last 15? years.
Stephen J Smoogen.