There are still requirement on mkinstalldirs on 0.14.1. I will probe
upstream later regarding this. But since I was planning to upgrade
gettext in FC2, I will upgrdae to 0.14.1 soon.
On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 18:14, Jens Petersen wrote:
>>>>> "Owen" == Owen Taylor
Owen> On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 10:56, Tim Waugh wrote:
>> The automake we have in Fedora development no longer
>> provides mkinstalldirs, but the gettext m4 macros and
>> Makefile.in.in still want to use it. The same goes
>> for glib-gettext.m4.
Well at least gettext still includes "/usr/share/gettext/mkinstalldirs".
>From Automake 1.8 entry in the NEWS file:
- Because `mkdir -p' is available on most platforms, and we can use
`install-sh -d' when it is not, the use of the mkinstalldirs
script is being phased out. `automake --add-missing' no longer
installs it, and if you remove mkinstalldirs from your package,
automake will define $(mkinstalldirs) as an alias for $(mkdir_p).
Gettext 0.12.1 still requires mkinstalldirs. Fortunately
gettextize and autopoint will install it when needed. Automake
will continue to define the $(mkinstalldirs) and to distribute
mkinstalldirs when this script is in the source tree.
So I think you can run "gettextize -f -c" in your bootstrap
script or just copy over /usr/share/gettext/mkinstalldirs
directly if you're using glib-gettext as a "workaround".
(Fwiw gettext-0.14.1 still seems to require mkinstalldirs too.)
>> Are these things that we need to fix before release?
>> I guess they'll prevent maintainers from being able
>> to release packages using Fedora Core 2..
Owen> Well, you can always just use automake-1.7. We are
Owen> (I assume, since it's what GNOME-2.6 will require)
Owen> still shipping it.
We don't have an automake17 package yet, but since there
have been requests for it, I will probably be adding one soon.
In the long term I guess the requirement for mkinstalldirs
will go away from gettext and the glib wrapper.