On 21/01/15 11:49, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
I don't have a solution to bring extra resources to reviewing
(which
will be the ideal), but I'd like to propose an amendment to allow
bringing packages even if no reviewers are available (the typical case).
Step 6: ... If the proposed package is not reviewed for 2 months, the
package must be reviewed by the submitter, and a git module with the
master branch will be approved.
Ugh,
thank you for trying to address our way-too-long review queue.
I agree, the submitter should review their own submission, but this
review should be ideally done before sending a package up for review
through a second pair of eyes.
Let's make an example, a submitter puts up a review containing
copyrighted material; this should be caught during review process. Due
the submitter will think, everything is alright, he will check that
material into SCM and we'll start distributing that.
Matthias