On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 15:33:34 +0100
Ralf Corsepius <rc040203(a)freenet.de> wrote:
It renders the primary purpose of "testing" absurd:
"testing" packages
for "updates" (testing == volatile, scratch, ... irrelevant)
What matters, is packages which are being pushed from "testing" to
"updates" containing appropriate EVRS at the very moment they are
being pushed.
Do you often build a package for testing, find out it works, and then
go and rebuild it /again/ with a proper nvr?
A good nevra strategy across your branches should give you the freedom
to use always good nevras for testing, so on the chance that one of
your builds is good it can just be moved and you don't have to rebuild
just to use a good nevra.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?