On 2014-01-05 19:24, Lars E. Pettersson wrote:
On 01/05/2014 07:07 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-01-05 at 10:04 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Sun, 2014-01-05 at 10:27 +0100, Lars E. Pettersson wrote:
...
>>> The running kernel should not be removed with a simple 'dnf erase
>>> kernel' (why did they change remove into erase?),
>>
>> They didn't. Both work on both.
>
> It's symptomatic of how fucking terrible this thread is, btw, that
> people would post without checking any of this. It takes about ten
> seconds to open a kernel and run 'yum remove foo', 'yum erase foo',
'dnf
> remove foo', 'dnf erase foo'. If you're not going to go to *that*
much
> trouble, it's a bit rich to start excoriating the dnf devs.
As I mentioned before I only auto completed yum, remove is not party
of the auto completed commands. If remove should be there, then this
is a bug. I will file one.
dnf has no auto completion and I have only seen reference to erase.
The man page of dnf does not mention remove (it mentions 'group
remove'). This should probably be added. I will file a bug on that one
too.
As a side not 'dnf --help' shows:
'--version show Yum version and exit'
which probably also is wrong.
This is by no mean any excoriation of the dnf devs on my part.
Three documentation "bugs" out of a side track of a thread is not a
terrible thread, in my opinion...
Lars
Add one doc bug for yum-builddep whtch I filed while messing around
after reading this - that makes four.
--alec