On 10/24/2011 04:52 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
I'm not really seeing why this'd be a better approach than
what I
suggested above.
This isn't better in case we don't ship -sysvinit sub-package. This was
meant as a general approach which should work even if a user has
installed sysvinit scripts from a sub-package (not mysql case).
It requires more assumptions about the behavior of the
systemd-sysv-convert code than I'm comfortable with --- in particular,
that that subsystem still keeps information around after a conversion
has been completed.
Yes, it's not perfect. But feasible from my pov.
Honza