2010/6/1 Ryan Rix <ry(a)n.rix.si>:
On Mon 31 May 2010 1:55:26 pm Paul Wouters wrote:
> since that's the preference
> of the maintainer, which violates fedora packagaging policies
Then a provenpackager should fix it regardless of whether the maintainer "is
too busy to fix it." and even then, they shouldn't be maintaining packages
they are too busy to fix! That's just as bad as blatently refusing to fix
this issue.
--
Ryan Rix
==
http://hackersramblings.wordpress.com |
http://rix.si/ ==
==
http://rix.si/page/contact/ if you need a word ==
The maintainer refuse some others to co-maintain tor package or help
him to solve this issue. It's a bit complicated to fix this, fedora
policy seems don't permit provenpackagers to commit a package if the
maintainer are very unwilling to do so. It should be decided by fesco
in which condition that a provenpackager can commit a package
regardless the unwillingness of the package owner.
Chen Lei