On Dec 28, 2015 18:02, "Bojan Smojver" <bojan(a)rexursive.com> wrote:
Reindl Harald <h.reindl <at> thelounge.net> writes:
> what do you try to tell us with that question?
I'm trying to establish whether Fedora needs a 43.0.2 (or better) build of
FF in order to close this security hole.
Is there any reason Fedora would not...? Regardless you could diff the
source code that was used to make the 43.0.1-fedora RPM vs whats in 43.0.2
and see if the hole is unpatched.