Hi Danishka Navin,
Good question on a bad place. Adding Fedora devel list here, there
could be someone who is able to answer you this question.
Jirka
On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 6:11 PM Vendula Poncova
<vponcova(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 7:29 PM Danishka Navin <danishka(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 6:16 PM Vendula Poncova <
> > vponcova(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 9:56 AM Danishka Navin <
> > > danishka(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Hi Jirka,
> > > >
> > > > I used the following command but did't use --product and --
> > > > version at all.
> > > > Btw, does livecd-creator read from /etc/os-release when we
> > > > ignore both --product and --version?
> > > >
> > > > livecd-creator --verbose --config=hanthana-live-
> > > > workstation.ks --fslabel=h30 --cache=cache --tmpdir=tmp
> > > >
> > > > Then I copied fresh kisktars shipped by fedora and rerun with
> > > > my custom configs.
> > > > I could not reproduce the issue.
> > > >
> > > > I wonder if the issue caused by following entries in the
> > > > /etc/os-release file.
> > > >
> > > > REDHAT_BUGZILLA_PRODUCT="Fedora"
> > > > REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT="Fedora"
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Btw, there is a new issue occurred.
> > > > As in this image, Anaconda keeps duplicating the values of
> > > > redhat-release file.
> > > > I am not sure if its a bug or I mage a mistake.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
https://pasteboard.co/IvvT4nf.png
> > > >
> > > > Added Hanthana Workstation (Vishwa)' in to the redhat-release
> > > > file.
> > > >
https://pasteboard.co/IvvSiU5.png
> > > >
> > > > If you have digital at the end, it only repeats the digit.
> > > > When using "Hanthana 30"
> > > >
> > > >
https://pasteboard.co/IvvTyBT.png
> > > >
> > > >
>
> Anaconda reads the product name and the product version from
> /etc/system-release on Live ISO or from the .buildstamp file in
> network installations. See my comment about the .buildstamp file
> below. I think that all these problems are related.
>
> > > > On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 1:06 PM <jkonecny(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > > You have probably used bad parameters when you were
> > > > > invoking lorax. You have to use correct --product and --
> > > > > version parameters otherwise we will be handling your ISO
> > > > > as Rawhide.
> > > > > Could you please tell us what command did you used to
> > > > > create your ISO?
> > > > > Regards,Jirka
> > > > > On Sat, 2019-08-31 at 18:12 +0530, Danishka Navin wrote:
> > > > > > Hi there,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > When I was trying to install f30 based remixed ISO,
> > > > > > "PRE-RELEASE/TESTING" text appearing in top-right
hand
> > > > > > side of anaconda GUI.
> > > > > > May I know what could cause this?
> > > > > >
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > for Live ISO, there is a little crazy logic that sets up the
> > > flag for a final release:
> > >
https://github.com/rhinstaller/anaconda/blob/master/data/liveinst/liveins...
> > >
> > > Basically, it is determined by a version of a package that
> > > provides system-release, so I would check that.
> > >
> > > What is the output of these commands, when you run them on your
> > > ISO?
> > >
> > >
> > > rpm -q --whatprovides system-release
> > > rpm -q --qf '%{Release}' --whatprovides system-release
> >
> > $ rpm -q --whatprovides system-release
> > fedora-release-workstation-30-900.noarch
> > $ rpm -q --qf '%{Release}' --whatprovides system-release
> > 900[
> >
> >
>
> It seems to be correct. The liveinst script should set the
> environment variable ANACONDA_ISFINAL to True before Anaconda is
> started.
> Network installations use the IsFinal attribute of the .buildstamp
> file to determine the value of the flag, but Live ISO shouldn't
> have this file and should use ANACONDA_ISFINAL instead. The path to
> the .buildstamp file can be /.buildstamp, /tmp/product/.buildstamp
> or set by the environment variable PRODBUILDPATH. Could you check
> that these files do not exist on your ISO?
> Otherwise, I would recommend to report a bug at
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/ and attach the Anaconda logs from the
> installation.
>
> >
> > > Vendy
> > >
> > > > > > both os-release and redhat-release updated and I can see
> > > > > > given values.
> > > > > > both fedora and fedora-update repos used during the ISO
> > > > > > build along with few 3rd party repos.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Danishka Navin
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > _______________________________________________Anaconda-
> > > > > > devel-list mailing listAnaconda-devel-list(a)redhat.com
> > > > > >
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
> > > > >
> > > > > Anaconda-devel-list(a)redhat.com
> > > > >
> > > > >
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Danishka Navin
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
> > > >
> > > > Anaconda-devel-list(a)redhat.com
> > > >
> > > >
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
> > >
> > > Anaconda-devel-list(a)redhat.com
> > >
> > >
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
> >
> >
> > --
> > Danishka Navin
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> >
> > Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
> >
> > Anaconda-devel-list(a)redhat.com
> >
> >
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
>
> Anaconda-devel-list(a)redhat.com
>
>
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
_______________________________________________Anaconda-devel-list
mailing listAnaconda-devel-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list