On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 03:12:56PM +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>>As soon as an feature depends on other components or several
other
>>components and their maintainers involvement/participation, then for
>>example the unresponsive maintainers policy conflicts with the
>>feature process given our relatively short development cycle. ( in
>Can you explain that a little more? Do you mean the policy is too slow?
Dead/un-maintained packages need to be removed/reassigned at the
very *beginning* of an new development cycle so feature owners and
others working in the community are dealing with active and actively
maintained packages.
Okay. But I'm having trouble seeing how that's a blocker for incremental
improvement to the features process.
--
Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁ <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>