On 20/09/2018 21:30, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 at 18:17, Jonathan Underwood
> In the process of orphaning a few packages lately, I noticed that
the
> user "cicku" (Christopher Meng) still had commit or admin privelidges
> on the package. That user hasn't been active for a couple of years,
> and I vaguely remember packages that he owned being orphaned. But, it
> seems like packages where he was co-maintainer had no changes.
>
> Is this desirable for inactive developers? What if their account
> became compromised? Would it be better if the inactive maintainer
> process removed priviliges across all packages, rather than only
> orphaning the packages they own?
>
I forgot to add this ticket for the relevant non-responsive maintainer
ticket:
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1542
Yeah, cicku has been inactive for some time, his last build succeeded
more than two years ago.
However, the ticket suggests, that the non-responsive maintainer process
has not been followed correctly.
Anyways, there was the FESCO decision to orphan his packages [1], it
seems that didn't happen completely?
Matthias
[1]
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.o...