On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 04:48 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 11/19/2009 04:31 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 22:37 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> If there were an automated sanity check somewhere as part of the pkg
>> release procedure, that might help. It would enforce proper %release
>> bumps.
>>
>>
>
> That is coming with AutoQA and it will certainly be able to find
> upgrade-path issues.
A lot of questions seem to be getting this answer but how close are we
to AutoQA doing all this? Are we going to start running it and reporting
bugs in Rawhide soon?
There's a weekly update on AutoQA in the QA group meetings, the
summaries and logs of which you can find linked here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings
I also summarize the weekly update in the QA section in every FWN issue.
I'm not working on autoqa myself, but we're actually already running
several autoqa tests - the results go to the autoqa-results mailing list
at present,
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/autoqa-results ,
until we have things in more 'final' form - and I would guess we will be
running tests of the kind discussed above, oh, during the F13 cycle.
Will could be more precise.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net