On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 19:55 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Stephen Gallagher
<sgallagh(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> So, unfortunately I didn't do my homework and I discovered (after
> getting this package reviewed, approved and committed), that they broke
> API in a recent minor release (newer than the one required by Review
> Board).
>
> Given that this package is currently unsuitable to serve the purpose for
> which it was added, I think I need to downgrade it to a known-good
> version.
>
> I'm curious whether (given that it was just built today and nothing yet
> relies on it), if there's any way I could avoid the epoch bump of a
> downgrade and instead have it untagged from Rawhide and an older version
> of the package built.
>
> I'll bump epoch if I have to (and if upstream doesn't come through with
> a workaround by tomorrow morning's Fedora branch), but if I can avoid
> it, I'd prefer to.
If it hasn't been through a mash yet, you can untag it from f18 and it
should be fine. If not, Epoch bump. :(
How do I tell if it went through a mash yet?