Adam Williamson wrote:
This is simply bad faith. I have seen absolutely no suggestion that
the
policy would be put out in such a way, and I can't see any basis you
have to infer that. The suggestion that a draft version of the policy
would be provided for feedback is not at all the same thing as what you
wrote above. As long as the policy was properly adjusted (or abandoned)
based on the feedback it received, what objection do you have?
The fact that the vote with no clear policy at all was dangerously close to
a 5:1 pass (in fact, as far as I can tell, if all the members who had
previously approved of a similar proposal in the somewhat chaotic discussion
had reiterated their +1, we'd have had something like 5 or 6 +1 votes) and
that this was only stopped at the very last moment when mjg59 volunteered to
write up a precise policy.
At that point, the vote got deferred for 1 week, but after almost half of
that time elapsed, I still haven't seen any draft policy, request for
feedback etc.
Isn't it natural that this leaves me really worried about what's going to
happen on Tuesday?
Kevin Kofler