-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
python-dateutil is old[0]. Fedora is carrying version 1.5, and upstream
is up to 2.3 . If you're receiving this mail directly, you are a
maintainer of a package that depends on python-dateutil, and we need
your help.
There are some changes that might cause breakage for you if the package
was updated. Luckily, there is a python-dateutil15 package that could
continue to provide the same code. The maintainer of python-dateutil15
has agreed to carry the one patch that makes it different from
python-dateutil.
After this update to python-dateutil15, maintainers of dependent
packages[1] can simply submit an update with the new requires for
business as usual. python-dateutil can then be updated to the current
version, and packages needing *that* can move forward.
I intend to file a bug against python-dateutil15 for the patch, a
tracking bug that's blocked by tickets filed against individual affected
packages and dependent on the python-dateutil15 change, and the tracking
bug will block the cited python-dateutil ticket. It should be
relatively easy to see when each step is complete, and a relatively
painless change for the maintainers involved. Please reply here with
any concerns about this process that might not have occurred to me.
[0]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1126521
[1]
https://immanetize.fedorapeople.org/python-dateutil.requires
- --
- -- Pete Travis
- Fedora Docs Project Leader
- 'randomuser' on freenode
- immanetize(a)fedoraproject.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUhOZ4AAoJEL1wZM0+jj2Z4jUH/A7d3onPkvwUNKUo5uCDXBJb
WIXOKtCZbK3LrBK7VSUk7px4cfOjcFumRCs+ZSXSq4URIRd8pxCFbcXWTpfk1fq3
uoxeZDXiK9Ab9P+2ksPDlPODuDxjoj77Pa79YNnoxUTL2tvdz2YcrlIqOrgJa2+h
uopMO8BF9qE6t8KXfhiGkP2w/EF6rfqrUaL0F7xvVzyDfkA/akS0LPcRyfQ0fOi6
Tbfr9Qoj54dpJWLjlBXky0RLodMXl2oFOnotdhmqAF9RRIbotYG03NXH9CeQn3SU
wdQm/RdXgQQyoTbghwq8k0yGWsPrhm4AyeC++XTKUtBFZwEEGxVj+2kAnpvJ24Q=
=7BTl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----