On Fri, 2006-02-03 at 12:14 -0700, Lamont R. Peterson wrote:
> On Friday 03 February 2006 11:44am, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-02-03 at 10:45 -0600, Steven Pritchard wrote:
> > > That reminds me... Has anyone ever tried to tie mock and ccache
> > > together somehow? It seems like that would speed up repeated build
> > > attempts noticably.
> >
> > It is potentially possible, but the problem is that ccache has in the
> > past caused build issues from time to time for various people outside of
> > mock. I dare not think what chaos it could wreak in a semi-automated
> > buildsystem. distcc *might* be a better choice, once it's ready.
>
> Instead of distcc, how about considering icecream?
Interesting.
http://wiki.kde.org/tiki-index.php?page=icecream
We use Teambuilder (mentioned in the IceCream wiki) for distributed
builds. It's a commercial product from Trolltech.
/Brian/
--
Brian Long | | |
IT Data Center Systems | .|||. .|||.
Cisco Linux Developer | ..:|||||||:...:|||||||:..
Phone: (919) 392-7363 | C i s c o S y s t e m s
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Hello
well my opinion is that there should be config hooks to easily hook in
components like ccache distcc and/or icecream.
regards,
Rudolf Kastl