On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 07:27:55PM -0500, Alan Cox wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 12:36:18AM +0100, Daniel Roesen wrote:
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68339
>
> Since 2002-07-09 this bug is in NEW state with noone caring obviously.
> I always get some muddy feeling when I read Red Hat people comments
> like "if it's not in Bugzilla, it's not there". This is not the
first
> instance where "even if it's in Bugzilla, it was just wasted time"
> applies... :-(
Red Hat not perfect, news at 11.
Indeed. :-)
> The fix is a five-minute-job.
Can you mark the bug as FC2 so nobody thinks its old and fixed in such cases
Uhm, you mean FC1 I guess?
And while we're at it... similar problem with GDBM.... report open since
2002-09-28, no comment. Unable to compile PHP with GDBM DBA support
because of this.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74643
Upgraded this report to FC1.
On a general note: whats the reasoning behind moving those header files
to a subdirectory? It breaks lots of things if no compat symlinks are
provided, but then you could just leave the headers where they were.
What am I missing?
Best regards,
Daniel