On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 08:42:57AM -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010, Till Maas wrote:
> Are there even any metrics about how many bad updates happened?
For me
> bug that can be fixed issuing an update are a lot more than regressions
> with updates or new bugs introduced with updates. If updates are slowed
> down, this will get even worse. Especially because the proposal is to
> use time instead of test coverage as the criterion to push an update to
> stable.
Actually the proposal is time AND test coverage.
I mind have misunderstood it, but afaics it only says that it will be
tested, because it spent time in updates-testing, but this is not even
true nowadays, even if packages stay long in updates-testing.
Regards
Till