On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 15:11 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 14:19 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> >>
> >> I don't understand.
> >>
> >> oget (1):
> >> zynjacku
> >>
> >> This new package was built 1 day before your email. Do I need to apply
> >> for a final freeze break? I don't care if the package goes directly to
> >> F-11 or to the updates.
> >
> > It should go somewhere, I suppose I'll have to try and modify the script
> > to look at pending updates, but those aren't guaranteed to go out, so
> > you could also just mentally filter it.
> >
> > This is the problem with taking so long to do your builds, the
> > constraints of the testing start to break down.
> >
>
> Phew... I built the package 4 hours after cvs was done. Is that considered slow?
>
> Orcan
>
> ref:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492990
I didn't mean you in particular, I meant that we're months from the
effort start and still having to track down undone builds. This is
starting to conflict with folks like you bringing new packages in during
a freeze period.
--
Jesse Keating
My intention, when I asked for cvs, was to have the package submitted
to F-11-updates, not to F-11 itself. The package got approved on the
17th. Should I have waited until F-11 is released to ask for cvs? I
want to learn this to do things the "proper" way next time.
Orcan