On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 16:37 -0300, Martin Marques wrote:
Jesse Keating escribió:
> On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 15:57:07 -0300
> Martin Marques <martin(a)marquesminen.com.ar> wrote:
>
>> git<date> from where? Remember that git is distributed and unless you
>> have a centralized copy git<date> can have more then one copy.
>>
>> IMHO, I've seen many cvs<date>, svn<date>, etc. that it'a
when there
>> isn't a real version numbering (or patches come from svn, cvs, hg,
>> git, instead of new tarballs).
>
> Wrong directions. <date><scm>
OK, why not <date><scm><sha1-hash>
The hash lets you identify the git or hg version uniquely.
With cvs or svn there wouldn't be any hash.
This is exactly what the guidelines say. Is anyone reading them? :P
~spot