On Qua, 2015-07-29 at 16:10 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Qua, 2015-07-29 at 10:05 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-07-29 at 12:47 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Tue, 28 Jul 2015 21:27:45 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >
> > > As I have thought for some time, I think we should have a team to
> > > keep
> > > packages and make migrations like gtk2 to gkt3, libgnome2, pyorbit,
> > > gnome-python2, pyhton2 to python3 , qt3 etc etc
> >
> > Wishful thinking. Porting from gtk2 to gtk3 is non-trivial or not
> > even
> > feasible in all cases (without dropping some
> > features/implementations).
> > Some developers are unhappy with gtk3. Others switch to Qt.
>
> There is little reason to switch from gtk2 to gtk3 if you are happy
> with gtk2 and don't want any newfangled stuff. gtk2 will be maintained
> for the forseeable future.
>
> Its a different story for the other GNOME2 era libraries mentioned
> here: libgnome, orbit, gnome-python2 - porting away from those is long
> -overdue if you haven't yet.
That is the kind of information that I'm looking for , ORBit and ORBit2
this stills works ?
I just checked and ORBit1, gnome-libs1 and libglade1 [1] are needed only
by 2 packages : spacechart and gtkd , while gtkd have updates spacechart
last update is from 2002-12 ...
[1] repoquery --repoid=rawhide --whatrequires ORBit-\* gnome-libs\*
libglade-1\*
ORBit-devel-1:0.5.17-43.fc23.i686
ORBit-devel-1:0.5.17-43.fc23.x86_64
gnome-libs-1:1.4.2-33.fc23.i686
gnome-libs-1:1.4.2-33.fc23.x86_64
gnome-libs-devel-1:1.4.2-33.fc23.i686
gnome-libs-devel-1:1.4.2-33.fc23.x86_64
gnome-libs-devel-1:1.4.2-33.fc23.i686
gnome-libs-devel-1:1.4.2-33.fc23.x86_64
libglade-1:0.17-34.fc23.i686
libglade-1:0.17-34.fc23.x86_64
libglade-devel-1:0.17-34.fc23.i686
libglade-devel-1:0.17-34.fc23.x86_64
spacechart-0:0.9.5-14.fc22.x86_64
gtkd-0:2.4.2-50.fc22.i686
gtkd-0:2.4.2-50.fc22.x86_64
libglade-devel-1:0.17-34.fc23.i686
libglade-devel-1:0.17-34.fc23.x86_64
--
Sérgio M. B.