On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 06:13:58PM +0100, Sandro Mani wrote:
>
> On 05.01.24 17:57, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 17, 2023 at 04:44:36PM +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 11:56:56PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > I'm planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 in rawhide. I did a
series of test
> > > > builds here [1], according to which scribus, vfrnav and pdfsign
currently do
> > > > not support podofo-0.10.x. To keep these functional, I've
prepared a
> > > > podofo-compat package with the previous 0.9.x library. The review
request is
> > > > here [2]. Happy to review in exchange.
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > we have the opposite situation with calibre: it builds fine in rawhide
with
> > > podofo-0.10, but does not compile against podofo-0.9.8 in F39. I just
> > > built calibre-7.2.0 in rawhide, and would like to do the same update
> > > for F39. Is there any chance you can also push podofo-0.10.x +
podofo-compat-0.9.x
> > > also to F39? I think that'd be OK, because we can keep the packages
that
> > > need the old version building, possibly after adjusting some BuildRequires
line.
> > Bump in the new year. PTAL.
>
> Hi Zbyszek
>
> I already took care of this:
>
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2334737
Oh, I missed that. Thanks!