Alexandre Oliva <aoliva(a)redhat.com>:
On Nov 7, 2003, "Eric S. Raymond" <esr(a)thyrsus.com>
wrote:
> Well, technically, yes...but not the way people usually mean it (16-bit
> chars like Java).
That's not UTF-8. That's another representation of Unicode.
Um. Yes. Were you under the impression I had said otherwise?
--
<a
href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>