Am 30.01.2017 um 17:33 schrieb Jonathan Wakely:
> On 30/01/17 12:34 +0100, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
>> Am 27.01.2017 um 13:12 schrieb Jonathan Wakely:
>>> On 27/01/17 13:02 +0100, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
>>>> Am 27.01.2017 um 12:21 schrieb Jonathan Wakely:
>>>>> As part of the
https://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/F26Boost163
>>>>> change to update Boost in F26 I've started rebuilding the
packages
>>>>> that depend on Boost, using the f26-boost side tag. That means
I've
>>>>> pushed a bumpspec change to their spec files, but the rebuilt
>>>>> package
>>>>> won't land in rawhide until they're all done and everything
in the
>>>>> side tag is merged back to the main f26 target.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you maintain a package that depends on Boost and this will
>>>>> interfere with any package maintenance you're doing please let me
>>>>> know
>>>>> and I'll coordinate the rebuilds with you.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm trying to get all these rebuilds done before the mass rebuild
>>>>> next
>>>>> week, but as usual there will be lots of FTBFS cases.
>>>>
>>>> There will be a new release for SWIG during today. Please don't
>>>> rebuild SWIG for now. I'll take care to have it built in the
>>>> side-tag properly.
>>>
>>> OK, thanks.
>> Swig is properly build in f26-boost now.
>
> Thanks. Several of the boost rebuilds can't proceed until hdf5 is
> rebuilt. Your hdf5 build failed due to a known bug for ppc64le:
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/PR79197
I'll resubmit the failed hdf5-build as soon as gcc-7.0.1-0.4.fc26 with
the fix for PPC64LE has finished building.