On 01/17/2018 12:38 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 01:02:32PM -0800, Troy Dawson wrote:
> Hello,
> Python3 will be in the next major RHEL release. I don't mean RHEL
> 7.6, but with numbers higher than 7.
> There are many, many packages with something like the following
>
> if 0%{?fedora}
> %define with_python3 1
> %endif
>
> If you have something like that, please change it to something like this.
>
> if 0%{?fedora} || 0%{?rhel} > 7
> %define with_python3 1
> %endif
I'll say it once again, but why can't we just have
%{python2_available} and %{python3_available} macros defined in the
base system?
Mostly because we can't change RHEL.
So, how about %{python2_missing} and %{python3_available}? Is that too
ugly and inconsistent?
--
Petr Viktorin