Am 23.12.2014 um 20:03 schrieb Samuel Sieb:
On 12/23/2014 10:24 AM, John Florian wrote:
> Following the example set by other packages, I’ve traditionally used
> /usr/local/share/ruby/site_ruby/facter/MY_PACKAGE, but what if you have
> a fact that isn’t written in Ruby? I’m also aware of
> /etc/facter/facts.d but I suspect that’s considered inappropriate for a
> package to use and should be left alone for site admins to use. The FPG
> didn’t seem to say anything on this.
>
Are packages really supposed to put files in "/local/"?
no - /usr/local/ is admin area - period