On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:01 AM, Bill Nottingham<notting(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Gregory Maxwell (gmaxwell(a)gmail.com) said:
> I doubt having consistently lower FP precision is anything many users
> are asking for. The few that do can usually take care of themselves.
And yet you say we should push them all to x86_64, which has
the same lower precision?
> > - More clearly delineates our support set of targets, sticking true
> > to forwards innovation, not necessarily legacy support
>
> If thats the case why maintain x86 at all?
Because it's 58% of our userbase (source: F11 torrent stats.)
Do we have any numbers on how many of this systems are x86_64 capable ?