On Wed, 12 Nov 2008, Dan Horák wrote:
Bill Nottingham píše v St 12. 11. 2008 v 12:08 -0500:
> Nicolas Mailhot (nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net) said:
>>> and it is less right, X is brought in, and also qt qt-X11. Should
>>> certainly be investigated.
>>
>> That's probably because of LSB compliance. As has been discussed
>> previously, someone needs to split the lsb package in server-side
>> stuff and other stuff (yes that would mean a system that used only the
>> first part would not be fully lsb compliant)
>
> Alternatively... make it optional? Is LSB conformance required
> for a minimal install?
IMHO LSB Core conformance should be required in minimal install
Why? LSB compliance should be an OPTION you can choose to have but it
doesn't need to be there for a system work very well.
-sv