On 19. 12. 19 21:10, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 10:24:16AM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> Side note: Considering that there are comparatively few armv7hl
> builders, I wonder why a rather big share of my noarch builds gets
> scheduled to run on them. Naively, I'd think that armv7hl should be
> busy doing builds for "archful" stuff since they're the slowest
I'm not sure why that is. I would expect them to be busy more as well.
I have the same experience with Python noarch builds.
I have figured out that it is quite deterministic:
When I need the build quickly and/or there are hundreds of slow-ish tests, I get
arm. When I don't need the build quickly and/or there are no tests at all and it
builds in seconds anywhere, I get x86.
Based on that, I've determined that it is just a bias :D
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok