On 12/07/2012 05:22 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 04:51:43PM +0000, "Jóhann B.
Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 12/07/2012 04:46 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 11:13 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
>> <johannbg(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> I am not sure why do you want to categorize it by size and impact, when
it
>>>> will be autocategorized by feedback on ML.
>>> It's common knowledge that you cant autocategorized by feedback on
Mailing
>>> list regardless what's it's for. ( For obvious reasons )
>>>
>>>> The only think matters is that the Feature is widely advertised and that
>>>> the community can provide early feedback.
>>> No that is not enough because in the end you will only get feedback from
>>> users of those feature not necessary from developers of other components
>>> that might get affected by that feature.
>> Advertising the feature on the _devel_ list is intended precisely to
>> get feedback from developers of other possibly affected components.
> Think broader than single announcment to an single mailing list
> since features more often enough touch more then one part of the
> community...
So your proposition is??
For example using the official distribution announce mailing list which
should reach broader audience then just -devel if people are inclined to
go down this path.
JBG