On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Matthias Runge
<mrunge(a)matthias-runge.de> wrote:
On 26/04/12 00:21, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu>
wrote:
>> My proposal is at
>>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Tibbs/RevitalizingSponsorshipProposal
>>
>> I've run this by FESCo, whose response was favorable, so I'm sending
>> this to a larger audience. Please let me know what you think.
>
> Looks good to me. I was unaware that sponsors are (currently) also
> provenpackagers. I've considered the idea of becoming a sponsor
Yes, this is a good step ahead. I never understood, why sponsoring is
mightier (in the view of doing harm) than proven packager. A sponsor can
elevate packagers and approve packages, a proven packager could demolish
all packages.
Well the idea was that a sponsor is a trusted packer so why would he
"demolish all packages"?
IMO the bar for being a provenpacker shouldn't be that high. Having
more manpower (as in people that can fix things globally) should be
something we want ....