Dne 24. 08. 22 v 16:58 Alexander Sosedkin napsal(a):
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 4:33 PM Alexander Sosedkin
<asosedkin(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 4:32 PM Fabio Valentini <decathorpe(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 4:28 PM Alexander Sosedkin <asosedkin(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 4:18 PM Vít Ondruch <vondruch(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>>>> Alexander,
>>>>
>>>> Would you mind to comment on your intentions with:
>>>>
>>>>
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/crypto-policies/c/2f33ffcfa7192037f969...
>>>>
>>>> which just landed in Fedora and broke Ruby test suite (even more then
it
>>>> was broken before):
>>>>
>>>>
https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/ruby
>>>>
>>>> Although I know something like this was discussed and is already
enabled
>>>> in c9s,
>>> Yes, it was: [2], [3]
>>>
>>>> I am not aware that the associated change [1] would be approved
>>>> nor that you would send a warning that this is going to happen.
>>> Wait, right. It was just the Forewarning1 [4] that was approved,
>>> not the Forewarning2 one.
>>>
>>>> Am I missing something?
>>> My intention was to break it right at the branch-off.
>>> What do I do now? Just keep it as it is?
>>> Revert, somehow initiate the approval early and unrevert once I have one?
>> I don't think keeping rawhide/f38 intentionally broken, even if you're
>> going to revert the brokenness in f38 after it branches off, is ever a
>> good idea.
>> Please revert the change and wait for the devel list and FESCo
>> discussion of the topic before implementing it again.
> Ack, will do promptly. My bad.
Reverted in crypto-policies-20220824-2.git2187e9c.fc38,
Also thx for reminding us that we should work with upstream to have it
properly resolved, because it would already help with c9s ;)
Vít