On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 01:50:32AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Matthew Miller wrote:
> Kevin, I disagree. A positive tone to discussion is important even when
> speaking the truth.
There was no negative tone in Matthew Garrett's original message:
> If the Fedora/ARM community don't care about feature parity with x86,
> then we should just drop them back to secondary status.
There was nothing impolite or insulting in there. It might be impopular with
the ARM people, but it's still a valid point that had to be made, and
shouldn't have been retracted.
In context, there was absolutely an impolite tone - it confounded there
being no interest in making a single package work on ARM with the Fedora
ARM community having no interest in feature parity. These are not
actually the same thing, and the fact that I equated them was
inappropriate.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59(a)srcf.ucam.org