On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 2:52 PM, Jeff Spaleta <jspaleta(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 11:43 AM, Dan Williams <dcbw(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> Well, eventually the connection editor could potentially replace the GUI
> functionality of s-c-n and ifup/ifdown could be pointed at NM, but we're
> not there yet. There's a few more device types that NM would need to
> support (mainly PPPoE/PPPoATM connections, good ISDN, etc) before we
> could think about replacing anything. They are going to be parallel but
> mutually exclusive for the time being. Also there will be some people
> who won't ever want to use NM for some setups even though NM could work
> for them; but that's fine.
Are those people...looking at using zeroconf. I get the reasoning for
avoiding NM in a more controlled networking situation... but zeroconf
seems like NM's bread and butter to me... but what the hell do i know.
-jef
How about static IPs and multiple concurrent networks? I couldn't get
either to work with network manager in F8
--
Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine
(
www.pembo13.com )