El Thu, 02 Feb 2012 17:45:38 -0800
John Reiser <jreiser(a)bitwagon.com> escribió:
> Does anyone object [to dropping support for HFS]?
Plain HFS has no journal, so there are workloads where HFS is faster
than HFS+ which has a journal. Is it economical to cater to such
cases? Probably not. However, I do have a PowerPC Mac Mini that runs
plain HFS and Fedora 10 with ext3.
Linux doesnt support HFS+ rw, if the filesystem has journalling turned
on you can only mount it read only
kernel: [785311.970344] hfs: write access to a journaled filesystem is
not supported, use the force option at your own risk, mounting read-only
Dennis