On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 08:53 -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, David Woodhouse <dwmw2(a)infradead.org> said:
> If it's built against
> versions of shared libraries which are no longer present, then I believe
> the installer will have removed the old version of those libraries and
> will have left the package in question broken.
Do you have evidence to back that up? Does anaconda somehow disable the
normal dependency checking? Normally, rpm would refuse to remove a
library that is still required by another installed RPM.
anaconda does disable normal dep checking if it can't resolve something,
that's true - however, it doesn't remove stuff.
-sv