Yes, I looked at that bug report and the somewhat terse response. I
thought I'd post here first before I went the bugzilla route.
Based upon the information I discovered tonight it seems a bit puzzling it
isn't included. Seriously, Ubuntu includes it and we don't?
Google is using it for the Nexus 9? The "experimental" rationale just
doesn't hold weight - especially since we are allowing for
BTRFS Raid5/6; which is made out to be toxic. If it's good enough for
Google and ahem: "Ubuntu" - it's beyond ridiculous we don't have it.
On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Orion Poplawski <orion(a)cora.nwra.com>
wrote:
On 12/21/2014 07:48 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> I was wanting to play around with F2FS about 6 months ago, found it
> wasn't yet included in the F20 kernel (even though Fedora packages
> f2fs-tools?). I did a quick search and found some comments basically
> saying it was under heavy development, stay away, etc. etc. so I kinda
> forgot about it.
>
> Today I see an article on Phoronix:
>
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTg3MDQ
>
> which wonders why Fedora doesn't ship it. Then, it says Ubuntu and
> other distributions are shipping it? I then find out that the Nexus 9
> tablet uses it as its default file system...
>
> So, Ubuntu and other distributions ship it... Google is using it for
> their latest tablets, yet Fedora says it isn't ready to ship?
>
> Something isn't right. I thought Fedora was suppose to be on the
> leading edge. Is this some sort of political thing with Redhat/Samsung?
>
Not much info at the old request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/
show_bug.cgi?id=972446 but that would be the place to ask I would think.
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane orion(a)cora.nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301
http://www.cora.nwra.com
--
devel mailing list
devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct