-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 02/04/2014 10:34 AM, Dan Mashal wrote:
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 1:03 AM, Stephen Gallagher
<sgallagh(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> This is the domain of Fedora Remixes, not Fedora Spins.
> Downstreams are permitted (naturally) to use Fedora packages for
> whatever distribution they want to create. The catch is that they
> have to follow the policies on this page:
>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Remix
>
> The primary difference is that Fedora Remixes have to provide
> their own website and image hosting, as they are Fedora-derived,
> not Fedora-provided.
>
> The sort of person who does that in Fedora in the first place is
> likely to do so for a Remix if they're using it as well.
Hi,
So where do we currently stand with this?
Are we leaning towards spins going away?
Are we leaning towards keeping some spins and getting rid of
others?
What about proposals for new spins?
I won't speak for all of FESCo, but I'm leaning towards: "Spins can
continue just as they are, while being aware that they continue to be
secondary to our primary deliverables". (Yes, I'm aware of the
KDE-as-release-blocker rule and we'll address that individually).
So new spins and existing Spins are fine (in my opinion) as long as
someone is caring for and feeding them.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlLww5YACgkQeiVVYja6o6PtYACfUeW9oYycRD7n9b3+kc593KFu
gFoAni0WVryNnZp2M7WTioqYXudwFTp2
=GfMO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----